Skip to main content

Film Review: "Destroyer"



REVIEW: Kidman Grits Her Teeth and We Grip Our Armrests in "Destroyer"
by J.T. Kolness

It's no secret that Nicole Kidman is a force to be reckoned with. She's a four-time Oscar nominee and winner (and a whopping thirteen-time Golden Globe nominee) and easily one of our greatest and most recognizable movie actresses. We shouldn't be surprised to see her take a role like this and knock it out of the park. In fact, we should be numb to her talents by now. And yet, within the first few minutes of Karyn Kusama's Destroyer, we are back to being transfixed by Kidman's raw talent. I could write a novel about how good Kidman is in this film and how much weight is granted to this story by her presence, but I have to keep this review a decent length, so allow me to dedicate the next paragraph to Nicole Kidman.

Kidman plays the role of a hard-boiled detective on the hunt for a gang leader Silas (Toby Kebbell) she knew in her past that has reemerged and she decides to take matters into her own hands. It's a very simple premise that we've seen before, but there's a genuine magic electricity that sparks between the collaboration of Kidman and Kusama that elevates this into near-great territory. It can be distracting at first to see Kidman looking as rough as she does as the character of detective Erin Bell. The makeup in general is so good, you might find yourself so absorbed into the image of Kidman's chiseled jaw and sunken eyes, you have to remind yourself to pay attention to the story. For as thin and aged as Kidman's character looks, when she gets physical, loading bullets into her guns and throwing hard-blow fists at Silas' accomplices, you believe it. Yet, beyond her physicality, Kidman finds the soul and fragility of her character, which creeps out the more her past begins to haunt her.

Kusama is the other magic ingredient to this production. Minus a very clever end surprise and a nice parallel past and present back-and-forth structure, the script follows along the usual conventions of the standard LA cop thriller. It's essentially, Bell hunting down people tied to Silas' gang and getting a step further with each encounter. The tension, though, is expertly shot and crafted by Kusama, who uses longer takes of Kidman running towards a dangerous situation and gliding the camera along her physical confrontations as though our visual perspective is taking part in the action. Kusama knows this is a grimy, gritty story and never holds back in forcing us to go along throughout this the length of this dark story. There's a moment where Kidman even has to... "pleasure" a former member of Silas' gang for answers and we watch Kidman brilliantly commit to this scene while our eyes commit to the screen, even when we want to look away. 

Kusama has even assembled a wide-range cast of great character actors to assist Kidman so that it's not entirely a one-woman show. Sebastian Stan continues his impressive resume of giving undervalued performances in awards-caliber films (following his terrific role in last year's I, Tonya). Stan plays Chris, a former partner of Kidman's, who in her past helped her infiltrate Silas' gang to take them down from the inside. Tatiana Maslaney is appropriately grungy and abrasive as a member of Silas' gang as well as his part-time lover. Kidman and Maslaney have a bare-knuckle brawl that (with the combination of their performances, camerawork, and swift sound design) is so brutal, you can feel every punch just sitting in your seat. Bradley Whitford (the decade's new go-to character actor it seems) makes douchebaggery look easy in his small, but memorable role as an associate of Silas.

My only flaw in the cast is Silas himself, Toby Kebbell. Kebbell is an excellent actor, and his performance here is strong, but he just never feels cast well. His presence and his look all feel the opposite of how his character is described in the film. It's hard enough to believe he and Kidman are supposed to be in the same age range (even with the excellent makeup). It doesn't help that he's wearing a wildly voluptuous black wig for most of his screentime. It's more of a nitpick casting choice than a real problem, but otherwise, the cast are all doing terrific work.

It's a shame that the film's last ten minutes wobble the film slightly when approaching the finish line. Beyond a solid twist, the anticlimactic finale just doesn't deliver in comparison to what came before and Kusama uses these last moments to inject a last minute dose of self-indulgent importance which feels unnecessary after such a clean-cut, lean-mean plot structure that brilliantly used its increasingly-heightened tension to showcase its moments of raw emotion. The film's last few moments just feel like the audience is being spoon-fed an emotionally-impactful ending when those of us that were locked in and engaged in the story already felt the impact and the closing moments just feel tacked on and drug out. But that's a flawed ten minutes in a brilliant two hour runtime. Destroyer may end up being one of the most overlooked and underseen great films from last year, and regardless on if the story doesn't quite resonate for some, Kidman is the reason to purchase a ticket. She uses the opportunity to get down and dirty to deliver one of the best performances in her amazing career and it needs to be seen to be believed.

“Destroyer,” an Annapurna Pictures release, is rated R for for language throughout, violence, some sexual content and brief drug use. Running time: 123 minutes. Three and a half stars out of four.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Film Review: "The Lego Movie 2: The Second Part"

An Infectiously Entertaining Return to Bricksburg By J.T. Kolness There are few cinematic surprises as genuine as 2014's The Lego Movie . The fact that it was good was a miracle, the fact that it was one of the best films of its year was astounding, but now here we are, five years later, and that film is now considered the Toy Story of its generation. Shepherded by writer-directors Phil Lord & Christopher Miller (the kings of turning bad ideas into genuinely great films), The Lego Movie inspired filmgoers young and old to dream and build big and love bigger. Oozing with nonstop hilarity, eye-popping visuals, and a crisp and wild pace, the film was a sugar-coated candy shop of earnest positivity and that care and attention was carried over into The Lego Batman Movie (to mostly successful results) and The Lego Ninjago Movie (to less than successful results), both released three years later in 2017. Two years later, Lord & Miller return to write the sequel, directe...

2018 in Film : An Overview & Recap

I'm not going to begin this first blog with an introductory post. I have no time for that and neither do you. So, cutting to the chase, we just had an entire year's worth of films that require my thoughts and I saw everything but The Wife . That's not my fault, that's The Wife' s fault. Come on, Sony Pictures Classics, you could have released The Wife  in 4,000+ screens in IMAX 3D and you chose not to, meaning I had to wait for a small window of time for it to screen at my nearby theatre for a week only for me to have car troubles that prevented me from going. My bad, movie. And yet, Glenn Close is still winning major televised awards and good for her. The last time a major acting Oscar contender had a film release this small to still be a threat at an Oscar win was Julianne Moore in Still Alice , which was a release so limited, I had to watch an illegal Oscar screener download on my on-its-last-breath dying 2005 Macbook. Here's some advice, SPC, when your film...

2019 Oscar Nominations: A Breakdown & Analysis.

The Oscars: Where There Is Room For More Than One Hysterical Queen A Breakdown of the Academy Award nominations and Assessment of What's Winning What By J.T. Kolness See what I did there? It's a reference to the "hysterical queen" line in Bohemian Rhapsody and a reference to Olivia Colman in The Favourite . It literally took me five whole minutes to come up with that headline and if you don't like it, piss off.  Without getting too ahead of myself, I'm just gonna go down the list category by category, offer my thoughts, and prognosticate at this point what's got the best chance at taking home that gold naked man. I won't be including the shorts on this list because typically when making my winner predictions, I usually just look up pundit predictions the night before the ceremony. I have no idea what any of these are except for Bao . Wasn't Bao great? Bao wins. Moving along... BEST FOREIGN FILM Capernaum (Lebanom) Cold...