Skip to main content

Film Review: "They Shall Not Grow Old"

No, "They Shall Not"

By J.T. Kolness

No one could ever really guess in the early stages of Peter Jackson's career that he would wind up being one of the most technologically pioneering filmmakers of this new millenium, but here we are. Delivering monumental epics with his Lord of the Rings trilogy as well as King Kong, and continuing to push the medium with the visual effects company WETA, for better or for worse (given your opinion on the high-frame-rate Hobbit films or The Lovely Bones), Jackson seems to refuse to be a slouch in the director's chair. In certain screenings of They Shall Not Grow Old, Jackson delivers a forward to the audience, explaining the inception of the film in which the Imperial War Museum granted Jackson their use of World War I footage archives and told him to do whatever he wanted with it. There was never really a concrete idea, just a massive catalog of footage that was left for Jackson to assemble, and he being as bold as he is, challenged himself to create the most authentic look at World War I ever created.

Restoring the footage was the first challenge. What were once scratchy, blurry, hundred year old film strips have transformed into crisp and clear digital images. Assisted with the aid of CGI, Jackson recreates the movements and facial expressions of these soldiers in as careful a manner as possible. There is ever-so-slightly an uncanny valley look to these soldiers when their movements get a tad too smooth, but given what Jackson is working with, it's something very easy to look past. The next challenge was the colorization to accurately repaint our vision of real battle locations. The final challenge, and the icing on the cake of this film, is having all of this footage displayed in immersive 3-D and it's as satisfyingly awe-inspiring as one could hope. It doesn't feel gimmicky, nor does it seem distasteful. In fact, its immersive view of the war gives the audience as startlingly real and understanding look at what it was like to be in the trenches with these men and only amplifies our respect and honor.

Now, the style of the film is the main reason for its need to be seen, otherwise it's nothing you can't get from watching a History Channel program on the subject of World War I. It's all fairly standard information. Backed up with narrative interviews from survivors detailing their recruitment and service, ranging from casual stories of humorous events to details of literal bloody horror, we get a well-rounded perspective of the British side of the war. Nothing groundbreaking, and perhaps short to a fault, as it encapsulates as much as it can into a 90 minute running time. Perhaps this film may not hold up to repeat viewings outside of the theater, but created as a theatrical experience first and foremost, its strengths are undeniable.

Layered over this footage are beautifully ADR-ed voice overs and sound effects that pair so well with the imagery, it's easy to get lost in the experience and completely forget you're watching a restoration. The film begins with a stunning shot of soldiers marching across the battlefield in 3D, the film clip at first shown small against a black screen as we continuously zoom in closer until the soldiers are marching around us. It teases us with that stunning shot and takes about a twenty minute stretch of standardly-restored 2-D black and white footage of pre-war events. But it uses that time to build up the moment to when we jump into the color 3-D and the effect that transition has is comparable to when the aspect ratio opens up in Xavier Dolan's Mommy (2014) or the use of IMAX in the climactic moon landing moment of Damien Chazelle's First Man (2018). The immediate transition will absolutely take your breath away. From then on, the effect holds up throughout the entirety of the film and every now and then it's acceptable to pull away mentally from the film's narrative just to gaze at what you're seeing and think about how amazing it is that they were able to pull this off. As a documentary, it's an acceptably standard film, but as a theatre experience, it's nothing short of astonishing.

"They Shall Not Grow Old", a Warner Bros Pictures release, is rated R for disturbing war images. Running time: 99 minutes. Three stars out of four.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Film Review: "Shoplifters"

REVIEW: "Shoplifters" Challenges The Definition of Family by J.T. Kolness From the soft and tender direction of Hirokazu Koreeda comes Shoplifters , a heartfelt story about the bonds of family: what can tear them apart, and what, like the grandma Hatsue's (Kirin Kiki) fabric needle can stitch them back together again. Family relations tension, secrets are withheld for long periods of time, and these people we grow to care about try desperately hard to hide aspects of their past that haunt them. There is something so innocent and sweet about this story that even when the most damning reveals creep their way into the story, when characters open up and speak honestly with one another, it's impossible to not still feel sympathy. Koreeda lets us get to know the sweet side of these people for such an extended amount of time in the most honest and understandable ways, that even when watching them commit their thefts, it's clearly wrong, but it's at least sati...

Film Review: "The Kid Who Would Be King"

Cornish Finds Some Magic In Traditional "King" Tale By J. T. Kolness It's hard to believe Joe Cornish only releasing his second directorial feature, given it's been eight years since his first and previous breakout midnight-madness smash Attack the Block . Cornish has long worked with filmmaker Edgar Wright and even collaborated with the likes of Steven Spielberg and Peter Jackson with the script to 2011's T he Adventures of Tintin: The Secret of the Unicorn , also eight years ago. Cornish seemed like he was truly planting his flag in the industry, but so much time had passed until now with not any much to his credit other than helping craft the screenplay of Ant-Man (2015) with Edgar Wright... years before the script was reworked by Paul Rudd and Adam McKay. So why has this talented filmmaker been such a recluse? Perhaps he was just waiting for the right project or maybe he just felt like hibernating. Somehow, things managed to come together for Cornish, ...

2018 in Film : An Overview & Recap

I'm not going to begin this first blog with an introductory post. I have no time for that and neither do you. So, cutting to the chase, we just had an entire year's worth of films that require my thoughts and I saw everything but The Wife . That's not my fault, that's The Wife' s fault. Come on, Sony Pictures Classics, you could have released The Wife  in 4,000+ screens in IMAX 3D and you chose not to, meaning I had to wait for a small window of time for it to screen at my nearby theatre for a week only for me to have car troubles that prevented me from going. My bad, movie. And yet, Glenn Close is still winning major televised awards and good for her. The last time a major acting Oscar contender had a film release this small to still be a threat at an Oscar win was Julianne Moore in Still Alice , which was a release so limited, I had to watch an illegal Oscar screener download on my on-its-last-breath dying 2005 Macbook. Here's some advice, SPC, when your film...